Web Site of Rajiv Pant

Victory is winning people, not defeating others.

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home Page
    • Read Me & Terms of Use
    • Archive of Home Pages
  • Writing
    • Management
    • Technology
    • Philosophy
    • Things
    • All Blog Posts
  • Resume
    • Resume & References
    • Biography
    • Awards
    • Speaking Engagements
    • Areas for Improvement
  • Photography
    • Photography
    • Videos
  • Personal Life
    • Personal Life Blog Posts
    • Personal Info
    • Friends and Social Networks
    • Charities I Support
  • Related Sites
    • Wiki of Checklists
    • Cofax: Open Source CMS
    • Effectuation
    • Cloud Computing Book
    • Comedy from India
    • India: Useful Info
    • SPV Alumni Site
  • Contact
    • Contact Info
    • OpenPGP Public Keys
    • Rajiv’s Business Card for Printing

Content Management: Content & Search Technologies

Leave a reply

Search, when effectively integrated with content, creates a combination that is greater than the sum of the two separately.

Let us consider an example.

A printed phone book has been available to people for decades. The information in it was accessible primarily for one intended purpose: search by name for phone number and home address. Accessing it differently (e.g. search by phone number for home address and name) was practically impossible for most people, even though the information was all there in the phone book. When the same phone book — the exact same content is made searchable via a computer, it raises privacy issues. When the same computer assisted search is made easily available to millions over the Internet, it raises serious privacy concerns. Notice the content didn’t change, but adding search-ability to the content transformed the content into something more powerful.

Search technology is a powerful enabler.

I do not view content and search technology as two separate entities that can be put together to provide better information. Many web sites do this and that is one of the key reasons why their site search is ineffective.

Search is most effective when it is intimately integrated with the content.

Content should not be considered merely a block of text or data. It should be considered an object: a combination of data and functionality. This is similar to an object in the computer science term object-oriented. The search-ability should not be external to the content, but the content itself should be search-enabled. Besides text and data, the content object should include both headers and in-line meta-data to be searchable better. A better form of content is one that has search-enablement built into it or integrated with it. This search-enablement could be programmable code, rule sets, meta-data or a combination.

Let us discuss an example to illustrate this.

A news media site has many types of content in it. Let us consider two of them: news articles and movie listings. When an external search engine such as Google brings back results from such a site, it does not effectively differentiate between these two types of content. For an external search engine, they are just web pages.

It would be better if the search engine employed on the site had an understanding of the types of content and searched it differently. Some sites such as the new Yahoo Search and C|Net do a fairly good job at this when they bring back search results from different types of content repositories.

When someone searches for “digital cameras”, the following types of content are of relevance to them: product information, product reviews, product storefront. This is because someone looking to buy a digital camera would like to know more about digital cameras, would like to read reviews of different digital cameras and would like to find a place where they can buy one. A search engine that treats all these different types of content the same — as web pages — isn’t very effective. An effective search solution groups these different types of search results for better access.

Search would be even more useful, if the content itself (being object oriented) knew how to interact with the search engine.

This could be achieved using adapters for each type of content. The search engine would talk to the adapter, which would be intimately integrated with the content. This would result in the content (via the adapter) responding differently to different types and combinations of search queries. It would result in a very useful and powerful search for the users.

At a news media site, examples of adapters would include: news article adapter, movie listing adapter, classified ad adapter, etc. These adapters would be implemented using an object-oriented programming language such as Java or C#. Search-ability would be just one aspect of these adapters’ functionality. They would be provide a wrapper around the content and provide functionality like accessing and editing the content. An example technical design of these adapters is the subject of my article for a technical audience.

Your feedback on this article will be greatly appreciated. Please share it with me via the contact page.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +1
  • Email

Related posts:

  • Future of Content Management for News Media for Web sites
  • iGo Universal Charging Adapters for Multiple Devices (Product Review)
  • Preserving URLs of Evergreen Content
  • Searching Instead Of Browsing: Organizing Information Using Labels as Meta-Data
  • Other Web Search Engines
  • Integrating Legacy Technologies With Web Systems at Newspapers
  • Web site hosting provider and technologies change
  • On content sites requiring user registration
  • Consistency in Labeling Ads as “advertisements” on Content Sites

This entry was posted in Technology and tagged computing, content management, Content management systems, Digital Media, Information retrieval, Information science, Metadata, search engine, Technology, Web search engine on March 7, 2004 by Rajiv Pant.

Post navigation

← What is Leadership? Robin Palley, Vice President, Marketing & Communications, Big Brothers Big Sisters of America →

Social Networks

Follow @rajivpant
View Rajiv Pant's  profile on LinkedIn

Related Posts

  1. Future of Content Management for News Media for Web sites
  2. iGo Universal Charging Adapters for Multiple Devices (Product Review)
  3. Preserving URLs of Evergreen Content
  4. Searching Instead Of Browsing: Organizing Information Using Labels as Meta-Data
  5. Other Web Search Engines
  6. Integrating Legacy Technologies With Web Systems at Newspapers
  7. Web site hosting provider and technologies change
  8. On content sites requiring user registration
  9. Consistency in Labeling Ads as “advertisements” on Content Sites

Recent Posts

  • Ray Dalio, Randall Munroe and I Think Alike - Culture of Courage & Candor
  • Maker's Schedule (For Managers Too)
  • Three Pillars of a Media/Publishing Company
  • HR Classification and Discretionary/Business Job Titles for Makers, Managers and Leaders in Technology
  • 5 Productivity Tips for Executives in Leadership & Management Roles
  • Your Brain At Work (Book Review)
  • Case for a Consistent, Comprehensible & Cost-Effective Vacation Policy
  • Product Maintenance vs. New Development on Web Sites, Mobile Apps and Other Digital Products
  • Management & Technical Career Growth Tracks (v2)
  • Productive Business Meetings

Read Me

This is my personal web site. It is not affiliated with any other person or organization. The material on this web site does not reflect the views of any organization or person, including any companies, groups or people I have been associated with.
Proudly powered by WordPress
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.