Web Site of Rajiv Pant

If you host and operate large-scale Web sites, or negotiate contract agreements with vendors that provide such services, you need to understand what should be included in a Web hosting infrastructure. This knowledge will help you in three areas:

1. Providing reliability, scalability & good performance
2. Minimizing risks via security, privacy, regulatory compliance and reduction of vulnerability to potential lawsuits
3. Reducing and controlling costs

This guide is meant to help you review upcoming contracts as well as existing services.

Likely audience for this article: Managers, directors and vice presidents of technology, operations or finance at organizations operating large-scale Web sites; Executives supervising technology: CTO, CIO, CFO, COO.

Seven Aspects of Large-Scale Web Hosting

Large-scale Web hosting infrastructure and services can be organized into the following seven areas:

1. Servers & Environments
2. Network & Other Appliances
3. Managed Hosting Services
4. Third-party Provided Services
5. Program Management Office, PMO
6. Account Management
7. Infrastructure & Facilities

Checklist for Review

You can use the following checklist to review your hosting services or a vendor’s proposal.

What to look for

When you review each item below, consider:

• Is this item included in the vendor’s proposal or in the services we are currently receiving? If it is not included, what are the good reasons it isn’t included?
• Is this needed for my organization’s current business requirements? Can we do without it? Is it a “must have” or “nice to have” for present and reasonable future needs?
• What are the alternatives?
• What is the unit price of this item? How does the price scale up as needs grow? How does the price scale down when need for this item decreases?
• What level of fault-tolerance does this item need? i.e. redundancy, standby backups, time to recover

Some of the above review questions may apply only to things and not apply to services and processes.

Servers

Servers may be physical hardware servers and/or virtual servers managed using software such as VMWare, Parallels Virtuozzo or Xen. The services listed below can each run on separate servers or multiple services can run on a server. It is generally better to have servers running only one (or minimum number) of the major services listed below. That reduces complexity and saves expensive staff time saved maintaining, troubleshooting and recovering. Virtualization makes it economical to have multiple virtual servers on the shared physical hardware economize costs.

The following is a list of commonly found services at large-scale Web sites that require servers.

• Web
  • HTTP(S) Content Delivery. E.g. Apache HTTP Server software
  • Streaming Content Delivery
  • Cache. E.g. to run products like Squid Cache, memcached
• Application
  • Content Management software. This is the software that the Editorial and Production teams use to submit, edit, package and manage articles, photos and other Web site content
  • Dynamic Content Assembly. Typically done using Portal Server software, either third-party supplied or in-house developed
  • Data Processing. E.g. workflow engines, jobs/tasks processing servers
  • Middleware
  • Other applications. These are applications that happen to be separate from the main content management system. They could be separate for any number of reasons. E.g. blogs, forums
• Database
  • Relational Databases. E.g. Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL
  • Non-Relational Data Stores. E.g. Key-value, “NoSQL” stores

Server Environments

An environment is a self-sufficient set of servers assigned to serve a purpose as described below. Large-scale Web sites typically utilize multiple environments.

• Production
  • This serves the Web sites to the customers and public.
  • Typically has 99.9% or higher uptime guarantee in the Service Level Agreement
• Staging
  • This is the environment where content packages are developed, integrated and previewed by Editorial, Design and Production teams before they are published to the end-users. For example, when working on a major site redesign or relaunch for several months. Since the tech teams are often making changes to the Development Integration and QA environments, they are not suitable for content integration work by the Editorial and Design teams. Staging is used in large-scale Web sites where mutiple Editors, Designers and Production staff are collaboratively creating content packages and new sections. In smaller Web sites or in cases where just one or two Editors are working on a piece of content like an individual article, previewing is done in the Production environment itself with access controls.

• Quality Assurance (QA)
  • The QA engineers perform Functional Testing and Load Testing here. Doing functional testing while a load test is running is sometimes a good idea as it simulates usage closer to live production.
• Development Integration
  • Software product code developed by different engineers is integrated here. There could be continuous integration or nightly builds.
  • This is where developers ensure that their code works with other developers’ code (does not break the build, and does not conflict resulting in undesired functionality)
  • Programmers should ensure that the product works here before handing it off to the QA engineers for testing

In a virtualized system the environments may not be physically separate and may regularly grow and shrink at different times. For example when hosted at a cloud computing provider, the QA environment may scale up during load testing and shut down completely during the hours the QA team is not working.

Network & Other Appliances

These are devices to which various servers are directly or indirectly connected.

• Routers
• Load Balancers
• Firewalls
• Shared Storage (Storage Area Network, SAN; Network Attached Storage, NAS)
• Backup & Restore systems
• Bandwidth (at origin hosting)
  • Bandwidth is not a physical thing, but since like electricity, fuel or cell-phone “minutes”, is something that is metered and paid for monthly, bandwidth usage and charges need to be carefully managed.

Managed Hosting Services

• Systems Administration
  • This typically includes all the management of the physical hardware up to and including the operating system and popular applications that complement the operating system.
• Database Administration Services
• Applications Management Services
  • This typically includes all the administration of the applications that run on top of the operating system.
• Systems Monitoring, Alerting & Reporting
• Web Support Help Desk, 24×7

Third-party Services

• Content Delivery Network, CDN (e.g. Akamai, Limelight, CDNetworks)
  • CDN Network Storage
  • CDN Bandwidth Rates for HTTP and Streaming
• External Monitoring, Alerting & Reporting (e.g. Gomez, Keynote)

Program Management Office, PMO

• Project Management
  • PM people, organization, processes
  • Collaborative project management tools, e.g. JIRA, RallyDev, Mingle
  • Shared documentation management tools, e.g. Wiki
• Change Management Processes & Tools
  • Documentation system
  • Tools for source control, build & deployment
• RASIC Matrix Describing Roles & Responsibilities
• Escalation Flowcharts
• Crisis Management & Emergency Procedures

Account Management

• Customer service
• Relationship management
• Master Services Agreement, MSA
• Statements of Work, SOW
• Service Level Agreement, SLA
  • What to look for in the SLA is the subject of a separate article in this series.
• Billing
  • Monthly bills provided by telecommunications (telco) and hosting companies tend be extremely complex and lengthy. As a result, they are difficult and time-consuming to review.

Infrastructure & Facilities

This item, infrastructure & facilities, is beyond the scope of this article. It includes the buildings, electric power, generators, climate control, physical security and related staffing.

This article is part of a series titled “Guide for the CTO: A compilation of articles on how to lead and manage technologies, projects and people”.

Tweet

1 save

In 2010, Cloud Computing is likely to see increasing adoption. Migrating Web applications from one data center to another is a complex project. To assist you in migrating Web applications from your hosting facilities to cloud hosting solutions like Amazon EC2, Microsoft Azure or RackSpace’s Cloud offerings, I’ve published a set of checklists for migrating Web applications to the Cloud.

These are not meant to be comprehensive step-by-step, ordered project plans with task dependencies. These are checklists in the style of those used in other industries like Aviation and Surgery where complex projects need to be performed. Their goal is get the known tasks covered so that you can spend your energies on any unexpected ones. To learn more about the practice of using checklists in complex projects, I recommend the book Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande.

The checklists are published on the RevolutionCloud book Web site at:

www.revolutioncloud.com/2010/01/checklists-migration/

and on the Checklists Wiki Web site at:

www.listswiki.com/wiki/IT_Web_Application_Migration

Tweet

Save

If you manage technology for a company that has a large Web presence, it is likely that a large percentage of your total technology costs is spent on the Web hosting environment, including the Content Delivery Network (CDN, e.g. Akamai). In this article, we discuss some ways to manage these costs.

Before we discuss how to optimize your architecture and applications to have economical and the optimally low hosting expenses, let us develop a model for comprehensively understanding a site’s Web hosting costs.

Step 1. Develop a model for allocating technology operations & infrastructure costs to each Web site/brand

Let us assume for this example that your company operates some medium to large Web sites and spends $100K/month on fully managed¹ origin² Web hosting and another $50K/month on CDN. That means your company spends $1.8MM/year on Web sites hosting.

It is important to add origin Web hosting and CDN costs to know your true Web hosting costs, especially if you operate multiple Web brands and need to allocate Web hosting costs back to each. For example, let us assume you have two Web sites: brandA.com, a dynamic ecommerce site costing $10K/month on origin hosting plus $2K/month on CDN; and brandB.com, serving a lot of videos and photos costing $5K/month on origin hosting plus $19K/month on CDN. In this example, brandA.com actually costs $12K/month, which is half the hosting cost of brandB.com, $24K/month. Without adding the CDN costs, you may mistakenly assume the opposite that brandA.com costs twice as much to host as brandB.com. Origin hosting and CDN are two sides of the same coin. I recommend that you manage them both together from both technology/architecture and budget perspectives.

Then you add the costs of third-party vendor provided parts of the site rented in the software-as-service model. Next, add licensed software costs used at your hosting location. Let us assume that brandA.com also has:

• some blogs hosted at wordpress.com for $400/month
• Google Analytics for $0/month
• Other licensed platform/application software running on your servers billed separately from the managed hosting. Let us assume brandA.com’s share of that is $1,000/month.

So your Web hosting and infrastructure costs for brandA.com would be $13,400/month. That’s $160,800/year.

Assuming that many of your Web sites share infrastructure and systems management & support staff at your Web hosting provider, you may not have a precise allocation of costs to each brand. That’s ok: It doesn’t need to be perfect nor a staff-time consuming calculation every month. Work with your hosting provider and implement a formula/algorithm that provides a reasonably good breakup and needs to be changed only when there is a major infrastructure change.

Side Note: In order to stay competitive, adapt to changes in the market and meet changing customer sites, brandA.com also needs to do product and software development on a regular basis. However, that’s beyond the scope of this discussion. Managing ongoing product and software development costs for brandA.com could be the subject of another article.

Step 2. Regularly review the tech operations costs for each brand and make changes to control costs

Every month, review your tech operations costs for your business as a whole and for each brand. Make changes in technology and process as needed to manage your expenses. If you don’t review the expenses on a monthly basis, you run the risk of small increases happening in various places every month that add up to a lot.

Without active management done on a monthly basis, brandA.com could creep up from $13,400 to $16,000 the next month and $20,000 the month after. That $1.8MM you were expecting to spend on hosting for the year could turn out to be $2.4MM.

So what does such active management include?

Monitor and manage your bandwidth charges. This is one to keen an eye on. If you bandwidth charges go over your fixed commit, your expenses can quickly blow over budget. If you find bandwidth use increasing, investigate the cause and make course corrections. In some cases, this may simply be due to expected increase in traffic, but in other cases it could be avoided. The related article on this site about taking advantage of browser caching to lower costs provides some tips.

Request your engineers to monitor and manage your servers resource usage (CPU, memory) so that the need for adding hardware can be avoided as much as possible. Enable and ensure regular communications between your technology operations team and your software development team so that software developers are alerted of any application behavior that is consuming more than expected server resources. Give the software developers time to resolve such issues when found.

Review the invoice details to make sure you understand and are in agreement with the invoice. A Web hosting bill can be very detailed and complex to understand. Do not hesitate to ask the hosting provider to explain and justify anything that you don’t understand. Don’t just assume the bills are always correct. They could (and occasionally will) be mistakes in the bills. Be sure to dispute these with the vendor in a respectful and friendly way.

These are just some examples. Please feel welcome to make more suggestions via comments on this post.

The time (and thus money invested) in controlling tech operations cost will be well worth the savings / avoidance of huge cost increases.

Keep abreast of evolving technologies and cost saving methods. Periodically review these with your vendor(s).

Cloud computing is exciting as a technology, and it is equally exciting as a pricing model.

If you find market conditions have changed drastically, request your vendor to consider lowering rates/prices even if you are locked into a contract. You don’t lose anything by asking and the vendor’s response will be an indicator of their customer service and long term business interest with you.

Tweet

Save

1. Fully managed Web hosting includes network & hardware infrastructure, 24×7 staff and real estate [↩]
2. The origin part of your Web hosting environments includes the network and server infrastructure at your hosting facility location(s) where your Web applications and installed and running. It could be in-house data centers or at providers such as RackSpace, IPSoft or Savvis [↩]

Companies that operate heavily trafficked Web sites can save thousands of dollars every month by maximizing their use of browser-side caching.

Large Web sites pay for bandwidth at their Web hosting data center and also at their content delivery network (CDN, e.g. Akamai, LimeLight, CDNetworks). Bandwidth costs add up to huge monthly bills. On small-business or personal Web sites where bandwidth costs don’t go over, this is not an issue, but on large Web sites, this is important to address and monitor.

Companies operating large Web sites often have complex situations like the following:

• An comprehensive and deep understanding of all technology cost drivers and their impacts on each other. For example, a programmer may think they are saving the company money by architecting an application in a way that it requires minimal hardware servers, but not realize that the same design actually results in even higher costs elsewhere like CDN bills.
• Busy development teams working on multiple projects on tight timelines. This results in compromises between product features/timelines and technical/architectural best practices/standards.
• Web content management and presentation platform(s) that have evolved over the years
• Staff churn over the years and an uneven distribution of technical knowledge and best practices about the Web site(s)
• The continued following of some obsolete “best practices” and standards that were established long ago when they were beneficial, but are now detrimental.

Tech teams at complex Web sites would likely find upon investigation that their Web sites suffer from problems that they either didn’t know about or didn’t know the extent of the damage they are causing.

One such problem is that certain static objects on the company’s Web pages that should be cached by the end users’ Web browsers are either not cached by the browsers at all or not cached enough. Some objects are at least cached by the CDN used by the company, but some perfectly cacheable objects are served all the way back form the origin servers for every request! An unnecessarily costly situation that can be avoided.

In addition to wasteful bandwidth charges resulting in high monthly bills, there are also other disadvantages caused by cacheable objects being unnecessarily served from origin servers:

• They slow down your Web pages. Instead of the browser being able to use local copies of these objects, it has to fetch them all the way from your origin servers.
• Unnecessary load on origin Web servers and network equipment at Web hosting facility. This can be an especially severe problem when a Web site experiences a sudden many-fold increase in traffic caused by a prominent incoming link on the home page of a high traffic like Yahoo, MSN or Google.
• Additional storage in logs at the origin Web hosting locations’ servers and other devices.
• Unneeded processing and work the origin servers, network equipment, CDN, the Internet in the middle all the way up to the client browsers have to do to transfer these objects from origin to the end user’s browser. Be environmentally friendly and avoid all this is costly waste.

The increase in bandwidth, load on servers and networking equipment and log file storage space increases caused by a few objects on Web pages being served by origin servers for every request may mistakenly seem like an insignificant problem, but little drops of water make the mighty oceans. Some calculations will show that for large Web sites, the cost of this can add up to tens of thousands of dollars a month in bandwidth costs alone.

How should companies operating large Web sites solve this problem?

For technology managers:

• Make it a best practice to maximize the use of browser-side caching on your Web pages. Discuss this topic with the entire Web technology team. Awareness among the information workers is important so that they can keep this in mind for future work and also address what’s already in place. Show the engineers some sample calculations to illustrate how much money is wasted in avoidable bandwidth costs: that will prove this is not an insignificant issue.
• If this problem is widespread in your Web site(s), make the initial cleanup a formal project. Analyze how much money you’d save and other problems you’d solve by fixing this and present it to the finance and business management. Once you show the cost savings, especially in this economy, this project will not be hard to justify.

For engineers:

• Read the article about optimizing caching at Google Code for technical details on how to leverage browser and proxy caching. It explains the use of HTTP headers like Cache-Control, Expires, Last-Modified, and Etag.
• Review any objects that are served by origin servers every time for legacy reasons that may now be obsolete.
• Combine some JavaScript files commonly used by your Web pages so that the one unified and shared file would have higher caching probability. Do the same with external CSS style sheets.
• Study a good book on Web site optimization like Even Faster Web Sites: Performance Best Practices for Web Developers. Share these recommendations and hold a discussion with your tech and production colleagues.

Tweet

1 save

Content on Web sites should be managed using systems that were designed from the ground up for the Web. Traditional content management systems with a legacy of features and workflows used for paper-based print products like newspapers and magazines are unsuitable for Web sites. The future of news media content management for Web sites is in:

• simple & quick workflows
• blogs & wikis as the main content types for text
• social networking & community publishing

simple & quick workflows

Complex editorial workflows make sense for print products (on paper) , where once the edition is done, the content and presentation state is “locked” and sent to the presses. Working with Web content writers and editors over the past decade, I have learned that simple, quick workflows are preferable for Web sites. Many Web site producers who hail from print backgrounds now share the same conclusion that complex content management is a hindrance to successful Web site production.

The concept of an edition of the entire product is not necessary for a content Web site. The atomic unit that can be managed and published together can be a package of articles and multimedia or even just one article. A Web site is a living, dynamic, ever changing collection of content where individual items can be updated whenever required or desired or even automatically based on usage.

To be competitive, content needs to be updated and published quickly. Corrections can be made anytime. Thus for Web sites, the editing and approval process should be streamlined and quick all the way from authoring to posting on the site.

A new concept

The ability of online word processors like Google Docs or WriteWith to enable multiple people to edit a document simultaneously and collaboratively is different paradigm from traditional check-in/check-out access control.

blogs & wikis as the main content types for text

Content management system (CMS) which offers the simplicity of blogs and are extensible via plug-ins to add functionality like WordPress or MovableType, make good foundations of a CMS for a news media Web site.

For revisions, editing history and access control, wiki software works well. WikiPedia and WikiNews, which are powered by the MediaWiki software are two good examples.

The concept of content management systems that combine the agility of blogs and editorial control of wikis is interesting to follow. The term bliki seems to be the leading classification of such products.

In many newsrooms, writers are increasingly using blog posts to publish news articles instead of their enterprise-class content management systems. When asked why, they reply because it is simpler and quicker and they don’t need the overhead of things like complex approvals, advanced version tracking and access controls.

social networking & community publishing

Managing content using a blog or wiki is social networking and community publishing activity. On the readership side, successful social news sites like Digg and Reddit have accelerated the evolution of journalism and readership habits towards the social/community model. The distinction between authors and readers itself is blurring with wikis and comments on blogs.

Social networking features are being added to a variety of Web sites. Going forward, expect to see social networking and community features in content management systems.

Conclusion

Media companies should move to using CMS products that prefer simplicity over complex editorial workflows which were a legacy of writing and editing for print products. A news item, story or blog post should be the same content type. It is likely that blogging products that have proven so successful in empowering talented individuals in competing with large companies will evolve into content management systems with the addition of wiki functionality.

Tweet

Save

My journalist colleagues at Wired.com published some of my comments related to Amazon S3.¹ Wired also posted another article titled Customers Shrug Off S3 Service Failure. I agree with the views of many of the customers expressed in the article. Don MacAskill, CEO of the popular photo hosting site Smugmug, wrote an understanding post about it.

My entire career working for media companies, I’ve held firm the belief that the uptime, reliability, performance, scalability, performance and security of commercial Web sites is of paramount importance. When sites that I’ve been responsible for have had issues, my colleagues and I have given our personal time and energy to resolution. With my teams, I spend considerable time on proactive measures. I’ve had the honor of working closely with and learning from some who do an excellent job running technology operations.

Experience has taught that things can and sometimes do go wrong. Sometimes calculated risks don’t pan out. Sometimes mistakes cause problems. We are human. We should strive for perfection; we can get close to it, but not fully attain it. We should be prepared for such scenarios. When they happen, we should work diligently and expeditiously on resolution and have frequent and honest communications with stakeholders and customers. Such communications during the incident should include:

Update 2010-Jan-24: This checklist is now maintained on the Checklists Wiki Web site at:

www.listswiki.com/wiki/IT_Incident_Reporting

During-Incident Communication Checklist

• Current status
• What is the full impact?
• Estimated time to resolution
• Any recommended workarounds until resolution, if practical
• Assurance that it is being worked on
  • It often helps to mention who all are working on it and what they are doing

The post-incident communications to stakeholders and customers should include:

Post-Incident Communication Checklist

• Summary
• What happened, how and why it happened?
  • Including full description of all impact
  • Do not blame² third-parties or say things like “beyond our control”. A technology leader takes responsibility equally for both insourced and outsourced products and services.³
• How it was resolved
  • If the resolution is temporary or long-term
• Next steps
• Plan for eliminating or minimizing this and similar incidents from happening again
• Thank all those who helped resolve and the customers for their understanding
• Mention the monetary credits you plan to give as per the Service Level Agreement (SLA)
  • Specify any additional ‘make goods’ or returns you plan to make to the customers above and beyond the credits as per SLA, if appropriate.

Stakeholders and customers here refer to internal customers of the technology operations team (e.g. the concerned folks in editorial, marketing, sales, finance, legal and other departments). External communications to the public Internet should be handled in consultation with legal and public relations.

S3′s outage (or any outage) isn’t to be taken lightly, but I have faith Amazon and their customers will learn from it.

Disclaimers:

• As explained in the terms of use of this site, any opinions expressed on my personal Web site do not reflect those of any employer, past or present. My Web site and I in my personal life neither represent nor speak for any corporation.
• I have no affiliation, financial or otherwise with Amazon.com. I happen to be a user of their products and services, some of which I like and some that I don’t.
• Personal Web sites like this are exempt from the performance requirements of corporate Web sites :-) My personal Web site is for expressing, learning and R&D. It also happens to be hosted on Amazon EC2 and S3.

Tweet

2 saves

1. Silicon Alley Insider and ValleyWag have amusing spins on it. :-) [↩]
2. There may be extreme instances, especially when criminal activity or malicious wrongdoing was the cause where it would be appropriate to blame someone. [↩]
3. It is ok to mention service providers, or describing external events for explaining what happened, but don’t do it in a “it was their fault, not ours” tone. The technology leader should factually describe what happened and take responsibility. [↩]

If you already know what the Social Graph API and XFN are, you can skip the background information and go directly to the Blogroll Links plugin for WordPress that is designed to work with these.

Update: 2010-Feb-20: Version 2 of the Blogroll Links plugin for WordPress uses the Shortcode API and so introduces a new code-tag format. The new plugin still supports the old (now deprecated) code-tag format for backwards compatibility. See below for examples.

Social Graph API

Google recently announced the Social Graph API.¹ From Google’s Code site:

With so many websites to join, users must decide where to invest significant time in adding their same connections over and over. For developers, this means it is difficult to build successful web applications that hinge upon a critical mass of users for content and interaction. With the Social Graph API, developers can now utilize public connections their users have already created in other web services. It makes information about public connections between people easily available and useful.

We (Google) currently index the public Web for XHTML Friends Network (XFN), Friend of a Friend (FOAF) markup and other publicly declared connections. By supporting open Web standards for describing connections between people, web sites can add to the social infrastructure of the web.

The Google Code site also has a video introduction to the open social graph:

The Google Code site has some interesting example applications. To see the power of the open social graph, follow these links:

• Connections between my URLs on my sites and my pages on social networking sites.
• Connections with some of my contacts found via social networks and sites that are friendly to the open social graph.

All I did was enter my home page http://www.rajiv.com/ into these applications and got the results linked to above.

XHTML Friends Network, a component of open social networks

XFN (XHTML Friends Network) is a simple way to represent human relationships using hyperlinks. In recent years, blogs and blogrolls have become the fastest growing area of the Web. XFN enables web authors to indicate their relationship(s) to the people in their blogrolls simply by adding a ‘rel‘ attribute to their <a href> tags, e.g.:

<a href="http://www.rajiv.com/" rel="friend met">Home Page: Rajiv Pant</a>

The above link means that the page at http://www.rajiv.com/ belongs to a friend of the person who who owns the page this link is placed on. The met tag specifies that the two friends have met in real life. The link above would not be placed on a page owned by Rajiv Pant. It would be placed by a friend on their page, for example, on http://www.paradox1x.org/

Here is another example:

<a href="http://photos.rajiv.com/" rel="me">Photo Albums: Rajiv Pant</a>

This link states that the page at the URL http://photos.rajiv.com/ belongs to the same person who owns the page this link is placed on. For example, the above link would be placed on http://www.rajiv.com/ telling the Web that the URLs http://photos.rajiv.com/ and http://www.rajiv.com/belong to the same person.

To find out how to write and use XFN, or to write a program to generate or spider it, visit the XFN Web site.

Blogroll Links Plugin for WordPress

For people who maintain their Web site or blog using the WordPress blog content management system, I created an open source plugin called blogroll-links that uses WordPress’ built-in Blogroll feature² and presents links to friends’ home pages and own pages on social networking sites using XFN in the links.

Features of this plugin

• It can show the links by category in blog posts and WordPress Pages.
• It uses WordPress’ standard built-in Blogroll links database. There is no hassle of another list of links to maintain.
• It can be used to show only the links assigned to a particular category, by stating the category slug as defined in that category’s setting in WordPress.
• It honors the Show/Hidden setting as defined for each link in WordPress.
• It displays the link in the same window or new window, as specified for each link in WordPress.

See this plugin in action

• http://www.rajiv.com/friends/
  • The two lists, first one of links to my own pages on various social networking sites and the second one of links to some of my friends’ pages are generated by this plugin. Yes, those social networks’ logo pictures are also taken by the plugin from the WordPress standard Blogroll links. Code:
  • <h3>My Pages on Social Networking Sites</h3>
[blogroll-links categoryslug="rajiv-web" sortby="link_name" sortorder="desc"]
<h3>Web Sites of Some People I Know</h3>
[blogroll-links categoryslug="people" sortby="link_name" sortorder="desc"]
• http://www.rajiv.com/charity/
  • This list of charitable organizations with brief descriptions is generated by the plugin. Code:
  • [blogroll-links categoryslug="charity"]
• http://www.rajiv.com/blog/2004/08/02/search-engines/
  • This list of search engines is maintained as Blogroll links in WordPress. Code:
  • [blogroll-links categoryslug="search-engines"]
• http://www.rajiv.com/
  • The featured links shown under the “What’s featured here?” section shows the links I’ve categorized as featured in WordPress’ Blogroll links. Code:
  • <a title="featured" name="featured"></a>
<h2>What's featured here?</h2>
[blogroll-links categoryslug="featured" sortby="link_name" sortorder="desc"]

Download & install plugin

• You can download and install blogroll-links from the WordPress Plugins Directory.

Tweet

8 saves

1. WikiPedia article explaining what an API, or application programming interface is. [↩]
2. It does not make you maintain yet another list of links [↩]

Over the past 15 years, as the Web has evolved, the web sites have gone through these generations. What’s likely to be next in the future of what the Web will be? This article describes the Web so far and what form it will likely assume.

• 1993-1997: Generation 1.0
  • These web sites can essentially be considered digital versions of printed newspapers, magazines and books.
  • Like with the printed products, the consumer is primarily a reader and interactivity is generally limited to filling out and submitting forms.
  • Content and design are the most important part.
  • Product = Content + Design
  • Examples: Most news and other content sites in the 1990s.
• 1997-2004: Generation 1.5
  • These web sites are similar to what interactive CD-ROM based software used to be in the 1990s.
  • The consumer is a user (as in user of software). There can be significant interactivity between the web site and the user. Interactivity between users is generally limited to discussion boards and marketplace activities.
  • Product = Technology + Content + Design
  • Examples: Online multimedia sites, online gaming sites.
• 2004-present: Generation 2.0
  • The concept of user-submitted-content grows stronger. Users in the virtual community of the site publish, share and view photos, videos and text.
  • The consumer is a community participant.
  • Product = People (User Community) + Technology + Content + Design
  • Examples: YouTube, del.icio.us, Wikipedia
• 2006-future: Generation 3.0 (prediction)
  • Concept of user-submitted-interactivity / user-submitted-programming arises. The users create, own, sell, share, alter and use interactive objects in the virtual environment.
  • Consumers are co-developers.
  • Product = Community Developed Interactivity + People (User Community) + Technology + Content + Design
  • Examples: Virtual environments and ecosystems like Second Life and Kaneva.

Tweet

1 save